Actually, I think I misunderstood your question. Local_start_time is never null. The first 32k records have nulls in created_at and updated_at fields. I guess they were migrated in later.
On Oct 14, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > The only thing I'd be interested to know at this point is whether that > timestamp column is NULL at all - and whether the results that don't make it > through are all set to NULL? Or any other distinction in the timestamp values > tied to what is/isn't in the Sphinx index. > > Cheers > > -- > Pat > > On 15/10/2010, at 1:15 PM, Jeff Luckett wrote: > >> Ok ... tomorrow though. >> >> Any other thoughts for quick information before I sign off for the night? >> >> Thanks, >> -Jeff >> >> On 10/14/10 10:12 PM, Pat Allan wrote: >>> Can you try Sphinx 0.9.9? It's the latest stable release. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
