Yeah, it's not perfect, but it's a step in the right direction. -- Pat
On 19/05/2011, at 3:16 AM, Alex K wrote: >> Now that there's the release of Sphinx 2.0.1-beta, it looks like we can get >> some better string facet support happening, as has already been discussed on >> this list between Clemens Kofler and myself. With a bit of luck, Clemens and >> I will have some time while we're in the same city to pair program and allow >> TS to degrade gracefully to the existing solution for those not using Sphinx >> 2.0.1. > > I just checked and only single valued string attributes are supported > in Sphinx 2.0.1-beta. So having separate SQL tables for the terms is > still necessary. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
