I'm using TS 2 with Rails 3 and with data from associations, and I'm sure plenty of others are as well, so not sure a sample app will turn up the problem.
Would it be possible (off-list, of course) to get access to this project so I can try to reproduce the problem locally? -- Pat On 18/11/2011, at 8:59 PM, Alex Deva wrote: > Like I said at the bottom of the previous post, it's Rails 3.0.6 and > the latest TS on the rails3 branch. > > It has to be a gem issue, because I have code that searches fine in a > Rails 2 app with an older version of TS, and also because the > sql_query produces correct results, and also because searching using > bin/search finds results. > > Would it be possible for you to create the simplest Rails 3 app, with > nothing but two associated models, add an index into one and see if > you get any results searching by it? I'm badly stuck here. > > On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hmm, still nothing obvious jumping out. Which versions of Rails and Thinking >> Sphinx are you using? >> >> -- >> Pat >> >> On 18/11/2011, at 5:41 PM, Alex Deva wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Here's the output: >> >>> $ bundle exec rake ts:rebuild >>> (in /Users/alxx/Projects/XXXXX) >>> Stopped search daemon (pid 59734). >>> Generating Configuration to /Users/alxx/Projects/XXXXX/config/ >>> development.sphinx.conf >>> Sphinx 2.0.2-beta (r3019) >>> Copyright (c) 2001-2011, Andrew Aksyonoff >>> Copyright (c) 2008-2011, Sphinx Technologies Inc (http:// >>> sphinxsearch.com) >> >>> using config file '/Users/alxx/Projects/XXXXX/config/ >>> development.sphinx.conf'... >>> indexing index 'content_core'... >>> WARNING: collect_hits: mem_limit=0 kb too low, increasing to 13568 kb >>> collected 6 docs, 0.0 MB >>> sorted 0.0 Mhits, 100.0% done >>> total 6 docs, 225 bytes >>> total 0.020 sec, 11232 bytes/sec, 299.53 docs/sec >>> skipping non-plain index 'content'... >>> total 3 reads, 0.000 sec, 0.1 kb/call avg, 0.0 msec/call avg >>> total 9 writes, 0.000 sec, 0.1 kb/call avg, 0.0 msec/call avg >>> Started successfully (pid 61215). >> >>> Here's the index definition (in the Content model): >> >>> define_index do >>> indexes body >>> indexes user.username, :as => :username >>> end >> >>> Here's the generated sql_query in config/development.sphinx.conf: >> >>> sql_query = SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE `contents`.`id` * CAST(1 AS SIGNED) + >>> 0 AS `id` , `contents`.`body` AS `body`, `users`.`username` AS >>> `username`, `contents`.`id` AS `sphinx_internal_id`, 0 AS >>> `sphinx_deleted`, CASE IFNULL(`contents`.`type`, '') WHEN 'Quote' THEN >>> 2863719664 WHEN 'Article' THEN 3448190970 ELSE 829950261 END AS >>> `class_crc`, IFNULL(`contents`.`type`, '') AS `sphinx_internal_class` >>> FROM `contents` LEFT OUTER JOIN `users` ON `users`.`id` = >>> `contents`.`user_id` WHERE (`contents`.`id` >= $start AND >>> `contents`.`id` <= $end) GROUP BY `contents`.`id`, `contents`.`type` >>> ORDER BY NULL >> >>> Running it in a console for $start = 0 and $end = 10000 does indeed >>> retrieve all the records, with the "username" association properly >>> renamed and all. >> >>> Other than the generated sql_query there are no differences between >>> the generated config when it works, and the one generated when it >>> doesn't (I've done a diff). >> >>> If I do an app-wide search... >> >>>> ThinkingSphinx.search 'azi' >>> => [#<Article id: 5, user_id: 42, ...] >> >>> So it definitely returns an Article (which inherits from the indexed >>> Content). But if I narrow the same search to the Article class... >> >>>> ThinkingSphinx.search 'azi', :classes => [Article] >>> => [] >> >>> And, the main problem (searching on both classes just to show you: >> >>>> Article.search + Content.search >>> => [] >> >>> This is on OSX 10.6.8 with ruby 1.9.2, Rails 3.0.6, Sphinx 2.0.2-beta >>> and whatever version of thinking-sphinx was installed by Gemfile from >>> the rails3 branch. Don't know how to check the version number but I've >>> run bundle update and nothing happened, so I guess it's the most >>> recent one today. I can't understand why, but thinking-sphinx doesn't >>> show up in vendor/cache (although riddle-1.5.0 is there). >> >>> Any ideas? >> >>> On Nov 18, 5:20 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi Alex >> >>>> Doesn't seem like you're doing anything odd… can you share the output from >>>> when you run the index task? >> >>>> -- >>>> Pat >> >>>> On 17/11/2011, at 11:20 PM, Alex Deva wrote: >> >>>>> Just a quick note to say I've noticed this happens for ANY >>>>> associations, not only HABTM. I've tried to add indices like: >> >>>>> indexes user.id, :as => :user_id >> >>>>> and after rebuild, no results are found. If I comment out the line and >>>>> rebuild, there they are again. >> >>>>> And strangely enough, searching using ThinkingSphinx.search works just >>>>> fine... >> >>>>> On Nov 17, 5:49 pm, Alex Deva <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> I've got a Content that habtm Areas. The index looks like this: >> >>>>>> define_index do >>>>>> indexes title, :sortable => true >>>>>> indexes body >>>>>> indexes areas(:name), :as => :area_name, :sortable => true >> >>>>>> has created_at >>>>>> end >> >>>>>> After I rebuild the index and restart Sphinx, I get no results even >>>>>> for a simple Content.search, just an empty array. >> >>>>>> If I simply comment the line that indexes areas(:name), search >>>>>> instantly works and finds stuff. >> >>>>>> What am I doing wrong? >> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit this group >>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. >> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
