I don't think so - but 1.4.10 was released a *long* time ago, so it's hard to 
be certain. I'm pretty sure the latest versions of dependencies will work with 
1.5.0 though.

On 15/10/2013, at 2:24 AM, Stan Shore <[email protected]> wrote:

> Are there any limitations on the version of Riddle for 2.3?  Any of the other 
> gem dependencies?
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Stan
> 
> Is there any chance you could create a basic test app that reproduces the 
> issue? I can't see any reason why the behaviour would be different, and it's 
> a bit hard to debug any further without access to either your app or a test 
> app that has the same problem.
> 
> With regards to gem versions, you can't use anything that's 2.x or 3.x - so, 
> the latest that's friendly for Rails 2.3 is 1.5.0.
> 
> -- 
> Pat
> 
> On 12/10/2013, at 3:41 AM, Stan Shore <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I wanted to give you a little more info.  I recreated this archived table on 
>> my test server (I was originally working on my development machine) and 
>> encountered the same results!  The Thinking Sphinx version was the same, the 
>> Sphinx version was different (2.0.9 on my dev machine, 0.9.9 on the test 
>> server).  I don't know that this info helps, but I just wanted you to know.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Stan
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Stan Shore <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It doesn't get any simpler.  The index definitions are identical:
>> 
>>   define_index do
>>     indexes :first_name, :sortable => true
>>     indexes :last_name, :sortable => true
>>     indexes :message
>> 
>>     has created_at
>>     has dist90038
>> 
>>     where "type in 
>> ('ContactShow','DoctorContact','ProcedureRequest','TellUs')"
>> 
>>   end
>> 
>> By the way, I tried removing the has statements and the where statement and 
>> reconfiguring and reindexing with the same results.  Even if I try the 
>> simplest search:
>> 
>> ContactInfo.search('worried')
>> ContactArchive.search('worried')
>> 
>> The first one works, the second one doesn't.
>> 
>> Seems crazy but there it is.
>> 
>> I'm wondering about versions.  What gem version for Thinking Sphinx and 
>> Riddle should I be using for Rails 2.3.15?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Stan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Can you show us the index definitions for both models, and the queries 
>> you're running?
>> 
>> On 09/10/2013, at 4:28 AM, stasch <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I've got two tables in the same database that are identical in structure - 
>>> columns, indexes, permissions (one is an archive of the other).  The model 
>>> files are not identical but the associations and index declarations are.  
>>> The archive model contains a subset of the functionality of the original, 
>>> but I have already gone so far as to reduce the model file for the archive 
>>> to just the associations and index declarations.  When I rebuild the 
>>> indexes after deleting all files in the index directory both models are  
>>> processed without complaint.  The index files are created with identical 
>>> permissions.  But when I do a simple search (for the word 'worried') on 
>>> each the original file returns many results, the archive file returns no 
>>> results.  When I use the error method to check for errors on the result set 
>>> it returns nil.  When I look in the query log it shows that the query was 
>>> successfully executed and returned 0 results.  But when I do a sql query on 
>>> the indexed field in the archive file it returns over 3000 results (select 
>>> count(*) from contact_archive where message like '% worried %').
>>> 
>>> My environment is Ruby 1.8.7, Rails 2.3.15 and Thinking Sphinx 1.4.10.  Any 
>>> help would be greatly appreciated.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/thinking-sphinx/tVmRxNDkM3M/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/thinking-sphinx/tVmRxNDkM3M/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to