Ah, so it’s working now? On 24 Jan 2014, at 2:42 am, [email protected] wrote:
> Ok I thinks was an error in the attribute definition. > > I mean: > > has product_digitalassets.product_id, as => :product_ids --> NOT WORKS > has product_digitalassets.product_id, :as => :product_ids --> WORKS > > > Il giorno giovedì 23 gennaio 2014 13:03:35 UTC+1, [email protected] ha > scritto: > Hi Pat, > > I've tried to make this modification. > > Add the attribute: > has product_digitalassets.product_id, as => :product_ids > > and changed the scope method in this way: > > sphinx_scope :with_12_nc > .... > with: { product_ids: ids } > .... > end > > ids = Array of product_id (Integer) and not product_12NC (string) > > the M:N join table product_digitalassets has these fields > > id (primary key) > product_id > code_12nc > digitalasset_id > > I've executed the task rake ts:rebuild and everything seems ok but > unfortunately I've no matches in my result. > > Is it possibile to search through the foreign key product_id and not primary > key id of join table? Or is this the problem? > > Thanks again. > Yuri. > > Il giorno mercoledì 15 gennaio 2014 13:23:42 UTC+1, Pat Allan ha scritto: > Hi Yuri > > The attribute should probably be of the id column, as that’s an integer (but > I presume code_12nc is a string? Sphinx doesn’t support multi-value string > attributes, nor does it support filtering on single-value string attributes). > > So: > > has product_digitalassets.id, :as => :product_digitalasset_ids > > And then in your search, if you don’t have the id values, you’ll need to > translate 12NC codes to the ids: > > ids = ProductDigitalasset.where(:code_12nc => params[:codes]).pluck(:id) > > And then searching: > > DigitalAsset.search :with => {:product_digitalasset_ids => ids} > > Does this make sense? > > -- > Pat > > On 15 Jan 2014, at 10:31 pm, [email protected] wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I need a little bit of support again if you can. >> >> This is my situation: >> - digitalassets (table) / Digitalasset (Model) >> - products (table) / Product (Model) >> - product_digitalassets (table) / ProductDigitalasset (Model) >> >> class ProductDigitalasset < ActiveRecord::Base >> attr_accessible :digitalasset_id, :product_id, :code_12nc >> belongs_to :digitalasset >> belongs_to :product >> end >> >> The Join table above has also the code_12nc that I need other than the two >> foreign keys >> >> How can I set a correct attribute in order to filter by the 12NC (product)? >> >> I've several attributes like: >> has .. >> has ... >> >> What should I put at the end of the list? >> >> has :product_digitalassets.code_12nc not works. I red the documentation and >> I've tried different combinations but I'm not able to understand what I've >> to do exactly to catch the values in the join table. >> >> Thanks again. >> Yuri. >> >> >> Il giorno martedì 14 gennaio 2014 14:43:21 UTC+1, [email protected] ha >> scritto: >> Hi Pat, >> >> yes there is a join table in order to link the digitalassets table and the >> products (12NC) table. >> >> I was wrong. It's a Many to Many association and not 1 to Many but I think >> there's no difference about the problem. >> >> Thank you for your clarification about the search against Sphinx and not >> MySQL. I will try to adopt your suggestion. >> >> Yuri. >> >> Il giorno martedì 14 gennaio 2014 13:00:46 UTC+1, Pat Allan ha scritto: >> Hi Yuri >> >> When you run the ts:index (or ts:rebuild) rake task, the Sphinx indexer >> captures all the data from your MySQL database - search queries then talk to >> Sphinx, not to MySQL. So, there’s no SQL query for performing the search >> (though Sphinx has its own query language called SphinxQL, which is almost >> identical to SQL, but it’s for talking to Sphinx, not databases). >> >> With your has_12ncs string - is this also in the database as foreign keys >> via a has_many association? If so, it’ll very likely be better to create an >> attribute in your Sphinx index which stores those foreign keys and then you >> can filter on that. >> >> Also, perhaps you’re already aware, but for Sphinx, fields and attributes >> are different things: >> http://pat.github.io/thinking-sphinx/sphinx_basics.html >> >> — >> Pat >> >> On 14 Jan 2014, at 10:55 pm, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> Thank you for your answer. >>> >>> I pass a :conditions like this: >>> >>> conditions: { has_12ncs: _12nc_string } >>> >>> where has_12ncs is a TEXT field in MySQL filled with a denormalized >>> structure of 1 to Many relationship between Digitalassets record and 12NC >>> (product) >>> >>> So the value in has_12ncs field can be ,123,456,789, >>> >>> the string passed to conditions: { has_12ncs: _12nc_string } is something >>> like: >>> >>> ",851322311100, | ,851304211100, | ,851340001000, | ,851343701000, | >>> ,851343801000, | ,851343901000, | ,851344001000, | ,858758938790, | >>> ,858759001790, | ,858759038790, | ,858759701790, | ,851343801020, | >>> ,851343701020, | ,851344001020, | ,851343901020, | ,858759901740, | >>> ,858759701740, | ,857542038000, | ,857594938000, | ,857542438000, | >>> ,850120596000, | ,850120696000, | ,850120796000, | ,850122601020, | >>> ,850122701000, | ,850122701010, | ,850122801000, | ,850122801020, | >>> ,851315001000, | ,851321801000, | ,851535101040, | ,858600015000, | >>> ,858600096000, | ,858600096010, | ,850122901010, | ,850123001000, | >>> ,850123001020, | ,851315001010, | ,850123001010, | ,851328301000, | >>> ,851328301010, | ,851328401010, | ,851385101080, | ,854001638000, | >>> ,854071038080, | ,854071038090, | ,854074638070, | ,856070001080, | >>> ,856079838070, | ,857532008400, | ,857532108400, | , ," >>> >>> That field has a FULLTEXT index. >>> >>> What's the query SQL triggered against this field and values? I'm not able >>> to print the pure SQL. >>> >>> Thanks again. >>> >>> >>> Il giorno martedì 14 gennaio 2014 10:46:14 UTC+1, Pat Allan ha scritto: >>> Hi Yuri >>> >>> I don’t think I’ve come across this problem before - that’s a *really* slow >>> query! >>> >>> Can you share your index definition with us? And are you also passing in a >>> search term, or field/attribute filters (the :conditions and :with >>> options)? >>> >>> -- >>> Pat >>> >>> On 14 Jan 2014, at 8:40 pm, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> > Hi all, >>> > for first sorry for my english. >>> > >>> > I've got a problem with RoR and Thinking Sphinx gem. >>> > >>> > I mean: everything works fine but when I try to get a search result >>> > passing a lot of parameter values through Active Record and TS API my >>> > application slow down and become unusable. >>> > >>> > I need to send queries on a MyISAM table with over 600.000 records >>> > >>> > There's a query field that I can match with 0 or N values >>> > If I set 0 or few values the query is fast. >>> > If I set 1000-2000 or more values for this field the query occurs over >>> > 10 minutes. >>> > >>> > I'm not sure about the query slowness because the problem occurs only >>> > when I try to get (for example) the total_count value. >>> > >>> > The query is something like: >>> > Model.search match_mode: :extended, page: page, per_page: per_page, >>> > :order => :updated_at, :sort_mode => :desc >>> > >>> > If I look in the searchd.query.log file I can find this informations >>> > >>> > [Tue Jan 14 09:42:08.394 2014] 774.749 sec [ext/2/attr- 64637 (0,20)] >>> > [digitalasset_core,digitalasset_delta] @has_countries ,98, | ,88, | >>> > ,ALL, | , , @has_12ncs ,851322311100, | ,851304211100, | ,851340001000, >>> > | ,851343701000, | ,851343801000, | ,851343901000, | ,851344001000, | >>> > ,858758938790, | ,858759001790, | ,858759038790, | ,858759701790, | >>> > ,851343801020, | ,851343701020, | ,851344001020, | ,851343901020, | >>> > ,858759901740, | ,858759701740, | ,857542038000, | ,857594938000, | >>> > ,857542438000, | ,850120596000, | ,850120696000, | ,850120796000, | >>> > ,850122601020, | ,850122701000, | ,850122701010, | ,850122801000, | >>> > ,850122801020, | ,851315001000, | ,851321801000, | ,851535101040, | >>> > ,858600015000, | ,858600096000, | ,858600096010, | ,850122901010, | >>> > ,850123001000, | ,850123001020, | ,851315001010, | ,850123001010, | >>> > ,851328301000, | ,851328301010, | ,851328401010, | ,851385101080, | >>> > ,854001638000, | ,854071038080, | ,854071038090, | ,854074638070, | >>> > ,856070001080, | ,856079838070, | ,857532008400, | ,857532108400, | >>> > ,857565108200, | ,857565738010, | ,857575738010, | ,857576838010, | >>> > ,857582338080, | ,857584738000, | ,857586738000, | ,857586838080, | >>> > ,857588838080, | ,857597838010, | ,857599938030, | ,854060038010, | >>> > ,854070038010, | ,854080038010, | ,857580000110, | ,856087638010, | >>> > ,857597838020, | ,857586838020, | ,857576838020, | ,854076738020, | >>> > ,857597838030, | ,857587838010, | ,856010038020, | ,856087838020, | >>> > ,857500038020, | ,857500138020, | ,857500238020, | ,857500338020, | >>> > ,854020038020, | ,856010048020, | ,856010058020, | ,857500348020, | >>> > ,857500358020, | ,857500368020, | ,857580001100, | ,851330038000, | >>> > ,851330138000, | ,851330238000, | ,851330338000, | ,851330438000, | >>> > ,851330538000, | ,851330601000, | ,851330701000, | ,851330801000, | >>> > ,851330901000, | ,851331101000, | ,851331201000, | ,851331301000, | >>> > ,851331401000, | ,851331501000, | ,851331838000, | ,851331938000, | >>> > ,851338038000, | ,851338138000, | ,851338201000, | ,851338301000, | >>> > ,851338401000, | ,851338501000, | ,851345638000, | ,851345738000ÿ >>> > >>> > the 12NCS are the values that I want to match in order to limit the >>> > resultset. >>> > >>> > Can anybody help me? >>> > Thanks in advance. >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> > "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> > email to [email protected]. >>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. >>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
