Hi Walter,
This isn’t currently possible, though certainly it wouldn’t be hard to add that
capability in, as you’ve noted. Right now I’m on the fence about whether I’d
accept such a patch though - I like the idea of having one clear interface for
such things (though I know I’ve not always followed that approach in the
past!), and the only benefit I can think of at the moment is saving a few
characters.
Are there other reasons around why this feature would be useful?
Cheers,
—
Pat
> On 17 Mar 2019, at 6:34 am, Walter Lee Davis <wa...@wdstudio.com> wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to allow the scope method in real time indexing to
> accept the name of a scope on the indexed model? I'd like to be able to use
>
> scope :published
>
> rather than
>
> scope { Speech.published }
>
> I got an error indicating that scope expects a block (1 variable rather than
> 0 passed) so it occurs to me that it may be possible to wrap the current
> behavior in if block_given? and then drop back to
>
> the_inferred_model.call scope_argument
>
> or [whatever actually works with models and scopes and isn't `send`]
>
> Any thoughts about this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Walter
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to thinking-sphinx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to thinking-sphinx@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to thinking-sphinx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to thinking-sphinx@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
