I tend to agree here. Other Java projects that have jars as
dependencies tend to put the jars in source control in a lib
directory. This would make our build file a lot simpler and the whole
project a lot easier to operate.
Does anyone object to adding the jars to the project? If not, I'll
add the needed jars and update the build file.
-Bryan
On Apr 10, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Michael Stockton wrote:
I tried to build thrift this afternoon and failed because I don't
have log4j on my machine. This seems to be a bit unfriendly at the
moment and to me feels like a 0.1 blocker-type issue. How many
people will give up on thrift if make fails? Can we bundle log4j
with thrift or find a better way to fail?
Michael
