Hi Chad, On May 27, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Chad Walters wrote:
Rush, Not an area of expertise for me but I had a couple questions: 1. What problems were there using the Boost timer library?
This was actually my first attempt. The Boost library uses the low precision Windows timer under the hood, so it's updating at 60 hz. I was surprised at this, but guessed that they didn't want to introduce other dependencies and didn't want to deal with the performance counter issues.
2. Did you look at Intel's Threading Building Blocks tick_count implementation?
No. I didn't find this when I was searching. I'll take a look. <snip> Best regards, Rush
