+1 as well. I tried it on some internal stuff that was running off of an OLD version of thrift, and it just worked.
Twitter thanks you, Todd :) Kevin On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Mark Slee <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. Clean download followed by configure + make yielded no issues for me. > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Reiss [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:26 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Vote for thrift 0.2.0 rc0 > > +1. I reproduced the build procedure and got a tarball with no nontrivial > differences. In the long term, I'd like to migrate to "make dist", but > there's > no rush. Also, there are some empty directories in there that I never > noticed > because git ignores them. Might be nice to rmdir them. > > --David > > Todd Lipcon wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to propose a vote to make the following tarball the official > Thrift > > 0.2.0 release: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~todd/thrift-0.2.0-incubating-rc0.tar.gz > > with GPG signature: > > http://people.apache.org/~todd/thrift-0.2.0-incubating-rc0.tar.gz.asc > > and md5sum: 9958c57c402c02171ba0bcc96183505c > > > > This was built from > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/thrift/branches/0.2.x at > revision > > 887836 using svn export and then running bootstrap.sh on an Ubuntu Karmic > > box. > > > > Please ensure that it builds and configures correctly on your target > > systems, and give a +1 if everything looks good to you. We need three +1s > > from committers before we can send it along to the Incubator PMC for > > approval. > > > > I've configured and compiled successfully on CentOS 5 and Ubuntu Karmic. > I > > also verified that the Incubation disclaimer is present at DISCLAIMER. > So, > > I'll start the voting with a +1 from me. > > > > -Todd >
