[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834439#action_12834439
]
Bryan Duxbury edited comment on THRIFT-697 at 2/16/10 8:33 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, I forgot to address the getter thing. I actually don't want setfield and
value to have standard getters, because they could interfere with generated
field methods. The fact that they basically look like getters is incidental;
they should not be considered instance variables by outside users. In this
respect, the objective was to make the implementation look like the Java
implementation.
was (Author: bryanduxbury):
Oh, I forgot to address the getter thing. I actually don't want setfield
and value to have standard getters, because they could interfere with generated
field methods. The fact that they basically look like getters is incidental;
they should not be considered instance variables by outside users. In this
respect, the objective was to make the implementation look for of like the Java
implementation.
> Union support in Ruby
> ---------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-697
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-697
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Compiler (Ruby), Library (Ruby)
> Affects Versions: 0.3
> Reporter: Bryan Duxbury
> Assignee: Bryan Duxbury
> Fix For: 0.3
>
> Attachments: thrift-697-v2.patch, thrift-697.patch
>
>
> We'd like to have direct native support for Union-style structs in Ruby.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
