I'd be willing to explore this option. This is just a more incremental approach, I'd say.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Mathias Herberts < [email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 23:10, Bryan Duxbury (JIRA) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel] > > > > Bryan Duxbury updated THRIFT-663: > > --------------------------------- > > > > Attachment: thrift-663.patch > > > > OK, how about this? > > > > The "beans" option will make sure the setter methods return void. > > > > The "private-members" option leaves the setter methods alone, but makes > sure the actual members are private. This is for those of us who want the > builder style setters but private instance variables. > > Why not come out all the way and have a 'builder' option which would > create a Builder class which would do something similar as what J. > Bloch describes in Effective Java (@see > > http://rwhansen.blogspot.com/2007/07/theres-builder-pattern-that-joshua.html > )? >
