I tend to agree with David on this one. It'd sure be nice, but it would add a TON of extra logic in the compiler to generate it.
Maybe we could do some work to support user-specified validation functions to be called during the standard validation? (These wouldn't be automatically cross-platform, but they would at least give you the opportunity to do the validation seamlessly.) On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:37 AM, David Reiss <[email protected]> wrote: > No. > > Jeremy Fergason wrote: > > Are there any plans to add user defined validation beyond optional and > required fields to thrift? It would be nice to be able to specify the > min/max range of numeric types, min/max length of strings, regular > expression to validate strings, etc. for structures in thrift. >
