I don't see a need to vote on resolution. It is boilerplate. Just send it to
IPMC.
On Sep 28, 2010 3:05 PM, "Joe Schaefer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this thread is plenty enough already. Once there's
> a resolution available, vote on that and then send it to
> gene...@incubator.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Bryan Duxbury <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Tue, September 28, 2010 3:02:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: October graduation?
>>
>> Do we have to hold our own vote to graduate, or does this thread serve
that
>> purpose suitably?
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]
>wrote:
>>
>> > I'd like to see thrift capitalize on the momentum
>> > it has seen over the past few months and move towards
>> > graduation in October. Based on the growth I've seen
>> > in this project recently I would now vote in favor
>> > of thrift becoming a full Apache project.
>> >
>> > The only pressing issue is to select a chair for the PMC
>> > (assuming you wish to go top-level, which I'd recommend).
>> > I'd like to suggest Bryan Duxbury as the natural choice,
>> > but there are other possibilities as well. It's up to
>> > you to decide.
>> >
>> > Once a chair has been determined all that is left is to
>> > submit a resolution to the IPMC, who will pass it along
>> > to the board if it gains approval. You have already met
>> > all of the IPMC graduation requirements and the thrift
>> > dev community is growing, so I wouldn't expect any obstacles
>> > from the IPMC.
>> >
>> > IOW the graduation process shouldn't be viewed as something
>> > heavyweight that will interrupt the 0.5 release process:
>> > you can do both at the same time.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
