Benedikt Meurer wrote: > Benedikt Meurer wrote: > >>Jeff Franks wrote: >> >> >>>Benedikt, Jasper, >>> >>>I'm just about finished the new layout pages using NO TABLES. I'm trying >>>to choose the minimum web page width to minimize ugly overlap of page >>>elements when the browser window is narrowed. Just out of curiosity why >>>does the page have to fit into an 890x670 firefox window? To set one >>>mimimum width across all elements I have placed the entire <body> >>></body> in a #container element. If I set the minimum width for this >>>container to 890px will that be about right? >> >> >>890x670 (+/- 30px) is the average size of browser windows we have here >>on both X11 and Windows workstations, for resolutions from 1024x768 (I >>don't quite get it why people use such large browser windows in such a >>small resolution, but whatever) to 1600x1200. Don't ask me why this is, >>but I assume that this size is a good compromise to not waste too much >>screen space for the browser window, but still be able to view all (but >>some broken) websites with horizontal scrollbars. >> >>The website does not need to be limited to that size, but it should be >>possible to display the website with a browser at this size w/o having >>to scroll horizontally or wrapping menu texts. There's no problem if the >>menu text is wrapped for widths below 750px. > > > BTW: Right now it looks like this for me: > > http://xfce.org/~benny/tmp/thunar-web.png > > The horizontal scrollbar stays even if I resize the window.
Just as a suggestion -- can we go live with this? Let's have something up which we can fix as we go along ... -- b _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev