Xiong Jiang wrote: > It's just my personal preference. :) Some people like GTK more while > some like QT more. Whichever they like, they always can express their > preference. It's not about the business to _evaluate_ the toolkit. > > IMHO C++ _is_ a little profounded (or in my awkard English, bloated) in > features as a language. That's why Java and C# are created and become > popular. > > Again, this is just MHO. Please do not take it as "bussiness of > evaluating C++".
Sorry, I don't get what you are talking about. Do you mean that the language specification for C++ is too complex (if so then Java is also a "bloated" language)? You might want to check Scheme then. If not, you should enlighten us poor souls, what's the difference between a "bloated formal language" and a "non-bloated formal language". Benedikt _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
