Benedikt Meurer schrieb: > Jannis Pohlmann wrote: > >>>From my personal point of view, it's nasty to have visible program >>directories in my home directory, because >> >> 1. this disallows me to create a folder with this name by my own for >> whatever use, >> >> 2. it creates a misch-masch of personal folders and program folders, >> which leads to confusion. >> >>I wouldn't mind creating new Templates for my own (even as a user) >>instead of making use of this ugly Nautilus behaviour. > > > Well, we have basicly two options here: > > 1) Templates folder path as configure option. > 2) Merge templates from multiple sources (including ~/Terminal if present).
s/Terminal/Templates/, eh? > > I don't really like either of them, tho. Understandable. Another configure option for this would be stupid, IMHO. This is a thing which should not need to be adjusted by the user. And hidden options are ugly as well. The only thing I can imagine is an option "[ ] Use Nautilus templates" which adds ~/Templates to the include/search path. If we'd go for 2) the ~/Templates folder still would be scanned and therewith the reasons for implementing 2) would still exist and cause problems. It's a difficult decision. I vote for using 1. $XDG_DATA_HOME/Thunar/Templates 2. /usr/share/Thunar/ (or something like that; additionally, for global templates) and dropping Nautilus compatibility here. I'd even offer myself for creating a buch default templates for the Thunar distribution. Yet, I wonder if the global (default) ones can be created by the auto* tools (or a self-written shell or python script) during installation, based on properly translated names. - Jannis _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev