Peter wrote: > ctrl+mousewheel behavior in Thunar is opposite Nautilus. I don't know > if anybody cares about being consistent with Nautilus in any way, but I > personally find the Nautilus behavior more natural. Just a random > observation.
That was changed on request to match the behaviour of Firefox. > Another thing I've been meaning to ask about is why Thunar uses > exo-icon-view instead of gtk-icon-view. Do you want compatability with > GTK versions older than 2.6? Is gtk-icon-view too Nautilus-centric? GtkIconView has absolutely nothing to do with Nautilus. Nautilus' icon view is based on EelCanvas. ExoIconView is API-compatible with GtkIconView, but its faster, requires less memory and is IMHO more maintainable than some parts of GtkIconView. Besides that, ExoIconView provides some additional features, like type-ahead search and single-click navigation. Benedikt -- Xfce -- small, stable, fast -- http://www.xfce.org/ (__) (oo) /------\/ / | || * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ ...."Have you mooed today?"... _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
