tomás pollak wrote: >>>>Who says it must be gnome libs? Still, there may be a few people >>>>around who like typing an 80 char line for scp every time they >>>>aiming copy a few files to a remote location... i'm not one of >>>>those. I agree gnome-vfs is bad, as far as i have seen it's not >>>>something a filemanager like thunar should build upon. But that >>>>doesn't stop anyone from getting this included in thunar otherwise, > > Yes, that's what I meant by "not gnome-dependant". I mentioned > "gnome-volume-manager" and "gnome-vfs" just as a reference, not to ask > for gnome library integration. (definitely not!) > > I think the idea of achieving this through plugins is really good. > That way, Thunar can be kept lightweight, but always having the > possibility to add new features through plugins. > > about the protocol URI scheme: it might come in handy for a user that > knows of their existance... but what about the normal user? > > however, a good idea is to enable bookmarking sites when using the URI > protocol. even better would be to permit "iconifying" these bookmarks. > that way you could have an icon for a FTP or SSH server somewhere in > your panel/desktop for quick access.
Maybe for Thunar 2.0, but not for 1.0. > Regards, > Tomas Benedikt _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
