Antti, I completely agree!
Thanks, Silvana "Pietilainen, Antti (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/21/2008 11:09 AM To <[email protected]> cc Subject Re: [TICTOC] Fw: Requirements draft - call for assistance Hi all, I have a comment on chapter A.3.2 on page 32 in the following paragraph: "The mappings of interest for telecommunications are PTP over UDP/IP, PTP over MPLS , and perhaps PTP over Ethernet, all in unicast mode only. Issues of a suitable control management and OAM environment for these applications are largely in abeyance, as are considerations about the exact nature of the network environment." It is too early to rule out the use of multicast in a requirements document so I propose to remove the text expressed in bold above. Best regards, Antti From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ext [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 October, 2008 15:36 To: [email protected] Subject: [TICTOC] Fw: Requirements draft - call for assistance All, I have made a revision for the requirements specification. I got feedback from several members for the wireless and CES applications, so I have put those requirements in the draft document. I also have updated the table based on the discussion we had in Dublin. Please, send comments, so we can progress the work. Thanks, Silvana Yaakov Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/18/2008 01:20 AM To "[email protected]" <[email protected]> cc Subject [TICTOC] Requirements draft - call for assistance Hi all, Yesterday the chairs and Silvana, who is co-editor of the requirements draft, discussed the progress of this draft. The requirements draft tries to cover quite a number of areas for which timing is relevant, and while there has been significant participation from the cellular and TDM PW communities, there has been inadequate input on most of the other areas. In particular, for the areas * industrial applications * test and measurement * electric power and teleprotection we have no data other than that "pulled out of the air" at the Paris meeting, and no one has expressed interest in providing insights into their requirements. On the one hand TICTOC needs to consider all of the applications that will need to distribute timing, but on the other hand if groups with interest in particular applications do not join in the effort, we will not be able to produce a meaningful document. Please consider this email as a call for participation for the aforementioned areas. If you are working or interested in them, please send an email to the list. If you know people who are, please forward this email to them. If we do not receive input that we believe reliably reflects the requirements of these areas, we will have to drop them from the document, and thus remove them from consideration while working on solutions. Y(J)S _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
