Todd Glassey wrote: > Harlan Stenn wrote: >> I believe the document should be accepted and advanced. >> > I dont... >> Todd, from the right perspective I can still find you to be pretty >> amusing. >> > Harlan thanks - any time you want your lawyers to talk to me you have my > number and since the ISC's attorney doesnt return my calls so... My > commentary stands - and that is that there is NO reason to add NTP > services to DHCP and not add those to NEA as well unless it is your > intention to cause damage to the NEA protocol's standards efforts. NEA > and DHCP services can work together or exclusively of each other and as > such its critical that NEA also have time services defined in it. > > Todd Glassey
This is not a legal question so I have no idea why you are bringing it up. If the DHCP WG wants to add NTP provisioning to DHCP services they have every right to do so. The NTP working group was only asked to lend its expertise to look at the proposal and make recommendations on any changes that might be needed. If NEA (whoever they are) wants to do the same they are free to do so. The NTP Working Group has no say on the matter except to review the proposal and make recommendations if asked. You are making it sound like DHCP is somehow excluding NEA from doing the same thing which it is not. Danny -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
