On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Pietilainen, Antti (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
No, I'm just considering the IETF/ITU overlap on optical transmission of
time.
Personally I'd be more comfortable with extensions/additions to MPLS being
done within IETF, not in ITU.
Antti
-----Original Message-----
From: ext Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 10:58 AM
To: Pietilainen, Antti (NSN - FI/Espoo)
Cc: ext Yaakov Stein; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] FW: 1588 over MPLS draft
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Pietilainen, Antti (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
When addressing PTP over MPLS with PTP protocol support from
intermediate nodes, one is actually solving the problem how to carry
time synchronization over OTN (optical transport network), SDH
(synchronous optical network), and SONET (and even Ethernet). This is
exactly what ITU-T SG15 is doing. I cannot see anything else but full
overlap.
Should I interpret the above that you're saying the problem and solution
is identical in MPLS-TP and MPLS?
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
