We are not talking about IEEE 802, we are talking about IEEE 1588. They definitely DO have a say about what happens with 1588. However, they encourage development of new transport layers for 1588, so I do not see a problem were we to decide to develop one.
Y(J)S -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Li Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 20:31 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TICTOC] Updating draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls Unless something has changed radically, IEEE has no say in what happens after the Ethertype. Tony On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > IEEE1588 worked with a number of organizations to map PTP over their > protocols. > > It seems unlikely that IEEE would object to the definition of a mapping to > MPLS if the consensus was that this was the best way to carry PTP over an > MPLS network. > > Obviously we should ask before publishing a specification, but the most > important starting point is to figure out the best technical solution to the > problem in hand. > > Stewart (speaking as an individual contributor. > > > > On 27/04/2011 15:25, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote: >> Yup, thats what i had meant - that it would require getting IEEE involved >> and we should only tread down that path if its really really required. >> >> Cheers, Manav >> >> From: Roberts, Peter (Peter) >> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 7.32 PM >> To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); Shahram Davari; [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Updating draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls >> >> >> Manav, >> Can you please provide a bit more background to the statement: >> I believe we had discussed that IETF cannot define new encapsulations in >> Prague? >> This is probably true that it would require a stamp of approval from IEEE >> but that needs to be verified. >> Peter R> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Bhatia, Manav (Manav) >> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 7:41 PM >> To: Shahram Davari; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [TICTOC] Updating draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls >> >> Yup, will do that. >> >> Cheers, Manav >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Shahram Davari [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 5.08 AM >> > To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); [email protected] >> > Subject: RE: Updating draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls >> > >> > Manav, >> > >> > In MPLS-TP the P2MP should work fine since it is all >> > configured by management. May be just add some text that says >> > using MPLS control plane the co-routing of the forward and >> > reverse direction is not possible but using management plane >> > this is possible such as in case of MPLS-TP. >> > >> > Thx >> > Shahram >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Bhatia, Manav (Manav) [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 4:35 PM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Cc: Shahram Davari >> > Subject: Updating draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls >> > >> > Folks, >> > >> > I am working on updating draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls as >> > per the WG feedback. >> > >> > As part of this I will change the OSPF and IS-IS capabilities >> > to be per link as against per node that its currently defined as. >> > >> > Will also clarify that FCS retention for the payload Ethernet >> > described in [RFC4720] MUST not be used. >> > >> > Should I remove Sec 5.3 "1588 over pure MPLS mode" as I >> > believe we had discussed that IETF cannot define new >> > encapsulations in Prague? >> > >> > I will also add some verbiage that P2MP LSPs may not work as >> > they only provide unidirectional traffic flow and cannot >> > guarantee a symmetrical path back to the head nodes. >> > >> > Anything else? >> > >> > Cheers, Manav >> > >> > -- >> > Manav Bhatia, >> > Service Router Product Group (SRPG) >> > Alcatel-Lucent, India >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> TICTOC mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TICTOC mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc > > > -- > For corporate legal information go to: > > > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > TICTOC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
