On 12/19/2011 8:29 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote: > Hi, > > We have posted a new draft that extends Router Advertisements to include information about the one or more NTP servers present in the network. This is useful where the delays in acquiring server addresses and communicating with the servers are critical (mobile environment for example). > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bcd-6man-ntp-server-ra-opt-00.txt > > Would be great to get some feedback from the NTP and the TICTOC WGs. > > We will also be soliciting comments from the v6man WG. >
Is there a reason that RFC5908 - "Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6" is not sufficient for this? Why do we need yet another way of specifying NTP servers? I'm copying the DHC working group on this though I think some of them are also on the 6man WG mailing list as well. Danny _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
