Hi Tal,
On 8/2/12 12:10 PM, Tal Mizrahi wrote:
Hi,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements-02
Following this week's TICTOC meeting:
1. We plan to release draft 03 within a month, and proceed to WG last
call.
2. Therefore, I will appreciate if people can send any comments they may
have by Aug 22.
3. There was some discussion about the "proventication" requirement. I
would like to suggest to change the terminology in the document, since I understand this
term is not very popular.
However, I believe that the requirement for a chain of trust is still an
important and valid requirement. Please comment if you think otherwise.
Given that proventic/proventicate/proventication was defined and used in
RFC 5906, I would suggest that this work and the Autokey revision work
coordinate on what terminology to use. It will be good to ensure that
they are in sync since the issues are essentially the same.
Regards,
Brian
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
