Re: [TICTOC] FW: Undeliverable: Fwd: Request to review IETF document on time protocol security requirements

Wed, 31 Oct 2012 05:32:13 -0700

Thanks Tal.

Somehow, the message sent by Lauren got corrupted, and there is an extra "m" in front of all the email addresses in the message. The original I sent in is correct, so I'm not sure how this happened. I've asked for a correction to be sent.

Karen

On 10/31/12 3:50 AM, Tal Mizrahi wrote:

Relaying feedback from David Ingram on draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements.

 

Thanks,

Tal.

 

From: David Ingram [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Tal Mizrahi
Subject: Fwd: Undeliverable: Fwd: Request to review IETF document on time protocol security requirements

 

Hi Karen,

One little pin-pricking error in the document is the reference for 1588. It is written:

  [IEEE1588]    IEEE TC 9 Test and Measurement Society 2000, "1588
                 IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization
                 Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems
                 Version 2", IEEE Standard, 2008.

but this should be 

  [IEEE1588]    IEEE TC 9 Instrumentation and Measurement Society 2000, "1588
                 IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization
                 Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems
                 Version 2", IEEE Standard, 2008.


to correct the sponsoring society name.

I am not familiar with IETF procedures, so is the security requirements doc intended to be an RFC that others refer to?

BTW, the address specified in the email bounced. I am CCing Tal as well just in case this bounces too.


Regards,
    David.

 

David Ingram RPEQ SMIEEE
PhD Candidate

QUTOpen Access Publications: QUT e-Prints

School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Science and Engineering Faculty | Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane Australia
E: [email protected] | M: +61 429 882436

"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?"
--  Albert Einstein



-------- Original Message --------

Subject:

Undeliverable: Fwd: Request to review IETF document on time protocol security requirements

Date:

Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:04:33 +1000

From:

Microsoft Outlook <microsoftexchange329e71ec88ae4615bbc36ab6ce411...@exchange.qut.edu.au>

To:

David Ingram <[email protected]>

 

smtp48.gate.ord1a.rsapps.net rejected your message to the following e-mail addresses:

[email protected]

smtp48.gate.ord1a.rsapps.net gave this error:
<[email protected]>: Relay access denied.

Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept e-mail from certain senders, or another restriction may be preventing delivery.





Diagnostic information for administrators:

Generating server: QUTEXEDGE05.qut.edu.au

[email protected]
smtp48.gate.ord1a.rsapps.net #550 5.7.1 <[email protected]>: Relay access denied. ##

Original message headers:

Received: from qutexhub02.qut.edu.au (131.181.107.107) by
 qutexedge05.qut.edu.au (131.181.191.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
 14.2.247.3; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:04:27 +1000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (131.181.118.254) by outlook.qut.edu.au
 (131.181.107.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 31 Oct
 2012 17:04:26 +1000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:04:21 +1000
From: David Ingram <[email protected]>
Organization: Queensland University of Technology
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Request to review IETF document on time protocol security requirements
References: <033e01cdb705$d7aa3cb0$86feb610$@com>
In-Reply-To: <033e01cdb705$d7aa3cb0$86feb610$@com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <033e01cdb705$d7aa3cb0$86feb610$@com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
        boundary="------------020804070908090102010005"
Return-Path: [email protected]

 

 



_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc




_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc

Reply via email to