On 11/15/12 12:57 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
Dear Yaakov, et al.,
changing from R/O paradigm to R/W is never a small deal. It is, IMHO, an
endeavor. Had the R/O version been through MIB Doctor review? I'd expect it
to be ran though again once R/W objects introduced.
Formal MIB Doctor reviews only occur when a draft reaches the IETF Last
Call.
Regards,
Brian
Regards,
Greg
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Yaakov Stein <[email protected]> wrote:
With chair hat off -
I am in favor of the change as long as it remains a minor change,
and introduce radically new functionality.
Y(J)S
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Karen O'Donoghue
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 13:00
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TICTOC] consensus question on change of scope for the 1588 mib
document
During last week's tictoc meeting at ietf85, it was decided that the mib
would be changed from a read only mib to a read/write mib for
configuration purposes.
The authors proposed this change, and they believe this will not
significantly delay publication of the mib.
The current draft is available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/tictoc/draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib/
The feeling in the room was that this was an acceptable change. This
email is to confirm that decision and to solicit comments or concerns
from the mailing list.
Regards,
Karen
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
