This is way off topic so apologies, but all the derivations I have seen
are first order, could you point me to a higher order version?

Stewart

On 12/02/2013 18:07, Danny Mayer wrote:
Please note that E = mc^2 is a first-order approximation so be careful
about this.

Danny

On 2/12/2013 12:23 PM, Yaakov Stein wrote:
Hi all,

We all know that in relativity theory E = m c^2

and that in quantum mechanics E = h f (where f is the wave frequency),

so that a mass m corresponds to a frequency f = m c^2 / h (called its
Compton frequency).

However, until now it has not been practical to directly relate
frequency and mass,

because c^2/h is just too big.

Well, in a new article
_http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6119/554.abstract_

researchers from Berkeley have been able to build a clock with an
accuracy of E-9

that directly connects mass and frequency.

Eventually this may lead to linking the definitions of the second and
the kilogram.

Y(J)S



_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc

_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc



--
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc

Reply via email to