Russell,
You actually submitted comments on the Security Requirements document
(not the MIB) after the close of the WGLC on that document. Yaakov and I
discussed this, and we decided to proceed with the submission of the
document to the IESG and to address those comments as part of the IETF
last call process. This document has been around for a long time, and we
wanted to proceed with getting it progressed.
Regards,
Karen
On 5/16/13 1:17 PM, Smiley, Russell wrote:
I also submitted comments to V05 on the mailing list and have not received any
acknowledgment as to whether they will be addressed or have been rejected.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/current/msg01387.html
Thanks for your help.
Russell Smiley
Principal Systems Engineer
+1 613 592 0859 x1831 direct
+1 613 322 9433 mobile
Integrated Device Technology, Canada Inc.
603 March Rd, Ottawa, Ontario Canada K2K 2M5
www.IDT.com NASDAQ: IDTI
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION: This email and any attachments thereto may contain
private and confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient.
Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto)
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any
copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Kevin Gross
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 1:09 PM
To: Karen ODonoghue
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-05.txt
I submitted comments on v03 11 January
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/current/msg01331.html). Vinay
indicated in a short message on 23 January the comments would be addressed in
the next version
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/current/msg01333.html). v04 was
published 31 January. I did not see any notes from the authors associated with
that revision. A quick check of the v03-v04 diff shows evidence that not all my
comments were directly addressed. Can I get a summary of how my comments were
addressed? I'm fine if some of these were rejected but I would like to verify
that they were given consideration.
Kevin Gross
+1-303-447-0517
Media Network Consultant
AVA Networks - www.AVAnw.com, www.X192.org
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]> wrote:
This message initiates a two week TICTOC Working Group Last Call on advancing:
Title : Precision Time Protocol Version 2 (PTPv2) Management Information Base
Author(s) : Vinay Shankarkumar, Laurent Montini, Tim Frost, Greg Dowd
Filename : draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-05.txt
Pages : 77
Date : 2013-02-25
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib/?include_text=1
as a Standards Track RFC. Substantive comments and statements of support for
advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial
suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This last call will end on 31
May 2013.
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
