Hi, I apologize for this late comment, as I could not attend the IETF meeting.
>Greg Mirsky presented his new draft from the MPLS working >group on Residence Time Measurement. There were a number of >questions related to the technical content of the draft. >Discussion should continue on the tictoc and mpls mailing >lists. (draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time-00.txt) > >The subject of the current draft on Timing over MPLS that >is being working in the tictoc working group was addressed. >There are still concerns regarding a way forward for this >draft. After much discussion, it was decided that the draft >would proceed in the tictoc working group as an >Experimental RFC. It looks like we are heading towards having two drafts that solve the same problem, which is most unfortunate. Isn't there a way to update Shahram's draft in a way that will satisfy Greg and Sasha's concerns and eliminate the need for draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time? For example using GAL instead of a dedicated LSP in Shahram's draft is an option that has been discussed before, and may be the least painful compromise. Honestly, the worst possible outcome is to define two different solutions. We obviously don't expect vendors to implement both solutions. I believe it is our obligation to reach a single solution for this problem. Thanks, Tal. -----Original Message----- From: TICTOC [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Karen O'Donoghue Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 11:03 PM To: [email protected]; NTP Working Group Subject: [TICTOC] minutes for joint meeting of ntp/tictoc at IETF 88 Folks, Below are the minutes for the joint meeting of tictoc and ntp at IETF 88. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to provide them. Regards, Karen _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
