Have you considered Wiki-in-a-jar? http://wiki-in-a-jar.sourceforge.net/
Not extensible like TiddlyWiki (the plugin architecture of TiddlyWiki is awesome!) but seems to be small, local, quick, and scalable. -- Bobman On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Morris Gray <msg...@symbex.net.au> wrote: > > > And it sounds like you've acumulated a lot of stuff, so a small army > > of TWs may be needed with a good workflow! :-) > > At one meg each seventeen TiddlyWikis isn't nearly an army, it's only > one TiddlyWiki more than a platoon :-) With http://tinytiddly.lewcid.org/ > driving them all and some judicious organizing and house cleaning > along with a MetaTiddlyWiki it's a great project :-) > > Morris > > On Jan 23, 12:50 pm, ccahua <cca...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jan 22, 4:38 pm, "ti...@timon.info" > > > > <timon.schroe...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > After having readhttp://www.tiddlywiki.org/wiki/Performance_IssuesI > > > realize that several MB are already a lot for TiddlyWiki and > > > converting my current content would result in a huge unusable thing. > > > Managing a lot of content efficiently probably really takes some > > > server software that can do preprocessing and caching and ideally > > > includes a full fledged database. Right now I think I will have to > > > leave my current content on my private machine at home. At work I'll > > > start with a blank TiddlyWiki and hope I'll get by with it for a > > > while, before it grows to large. Hopefully I have a better idea by > > > then 8-) > > > > Hi Timon, > > > > I too have confronted the same issue and I don't know how Eric at > > TiddlyTools.com does it- dense and rich but still loads quick! > > > > Nevertheless here are some observations of my experiments on scale: > > > > I've successfully tested TiddlyWiki for a knowledge base I help > > coordinate and found that I had to offload the assets to the filesytem > > and use TW more as a frontend viewer than a single all encompassing > > repository in order to contain the scale issue - > > > > So that large topics of styled content are contained in iframes on a > > shared or local drive as in tiddler body: > > > > <html> > > <iframe style="background-color:#ffffff; border-color:#ffffff; > > border:none;" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0" scrolling="yes" > > src="file://///pathtoyourfile" title="filename"></iframe></html> > > > > Images are handled in the same way: > > [img(480px,auto)[file:///path/to/your/image]] > > > > It was under 3MB covering 1000's of topics and associated images along > > with an issue log. But nothing like 17MB! > > > > Judicious use of an archival method to further segregate old from new > > content also helps. > > > > I've used this effective combo: ToDoTogglePlugin with CheckboxPlugin > > along with the essentials from Eric's TiddlyTools: Import and Export > > Tiddlers Plugins to manage that archival process. > > > > Udo's YourSearch along with his other plugins are also excellent for > > culling. > > > > I also tried using a flat file system with the data and going csv with > > the DataListPlugin at thehttp://baggr.tiddlyspot.com/which leverages > > Udo's DataTiddlerPlugin. It's great for long list lookups but > > ultimately stayed with the tiddler as unit KISS route as is much more > > familiar UI. > > > > Before that I did do a taste of running php5 locally then used BidiX's > > upload > > pluginhttp://tiddlywiki.bidix.info/#[[UploadPlugin%204.1]]<http://tiddlywiki.bidix.info/#%5B%5BUploadPlugin%204.1%5D%5D>for > > a flavor of local serverside, but abandoned once I got proof of > > concept. > > > > Finally, I've been experimenting with TiddlyWeb (AKA mother of all > > server sides) since it currently uses a local text store where > > tiddlers are file revisions in folders. You can make recipes from bags > > of tiddlers and mix and match rolling your own collection. The thing > > about TiddlyWeb is that my puny brainz doesn't have to know how to > > configure Apache or some other server magic, but sounds like you have > > the smart for that and serverside is not an issue for you. Chris > Denthttp://peermore.com/tiddlyweb/dist/and FND works with TiddlyWeb. > > > > So there are options if you want to stay local, but as we've seen over > > the years, scale is an important question when working lots of stuff > > in TW. > > And it sounds like you've acumulated a lot of stuff, so a small army > > of TWs may be needed with a good workflow! :-) > > > > hth > > > > Best, > > tony > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
