Mark, Eric & Mat *Wondering if a transclusion "knows" it is one? :-)*
Mark, not sure if you remember, but you and BTC came up with some interesting proofs of concept of direct jumps to tranclusions (& proto transclusions & potentially macro content) from view mode. The suggestive discussion is here: Communicating to writers the benefits of TW <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/tiddlywiki/B0VGpW27MC4/PyWpMucvBAAJ> What struck me about *Mat's Fantasy *is it seems part of the same desire to "stay-in-flow", rather than having to segway to get stuff done? I realise its not the same thing exactly as the OP, but the general impulse seems the same. Thoughts TT On Tuesday, 22 October 2019 17:17:52 UTC+2, Mark S. wrote: > > Notching it up away from fantasy, I can imagine a 3rd view/edit mode, > "Slicer mode". Similar to the slicer edition. You can click on paragraphs > and have options to convert it to a > transcluded link. The slicer might put interior macros or transclusions > into their own paragraphs, giving some work-around to the problem Eric > notes. > > On Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 7:53:28 AM UTC-7, Mat wrote: >> >> Eric Shulman wrote: >>> >>> ...might be transcluded from another tiddler. It might also be >>> generated by a macro or widget, >>> >> >> Ah, in deed! A fantasy it shall remain. >> >> <:-) >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6616b1ff-0b34-4ec7-82fe-d4668b15560a%40googlegroups.com.
