Ciao TonyM TT: It is actually easier to have "title" v01ch49pa17 (=volumn 1, chapter >> 49, pqragraph 17) than do it through another field. > > TonyM wrote:
> Whilst I think this can be an easy interim solution, because the key > contains the structure, and fields are a little more complex initially, I > do not think it the best ultimately. > I agree, sort of. BUT everything depends on USE CASES. In the specific use case (which I neglected to spell out!)---it is for standard novels. The primary order for scholars would be "vol-chap-para". For the use case what *is* needed is bookmarking and cross-links. The more complex scenario you suggest (I think) is unneeded. I'm open to suggestions. But I'd need top see the final *added value* for the purpose of semantic analysis of sequential long texts. Really what is needed, IMO, is a "*TW Data Design Clinic*" to advise on such issues interactively, case-by-case. Thoughts. Maybe fantasies. But its good to talk. TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c32d8926-4b54-42fa-ada1-2d74ac5de589%40googlegroups.com.
