I'm thinking "literal" might be broken, or maybe we're interpreting it too .... wait for it ... literally.
On Thursday, December 12, 2019 at 8:22:13 PM UTC-8, A Gloom wrote: > > Nice work Mark-- will be studying it... > > Hopefully that will work for PWL > > is literal not working in this use case? It will find the literal search > string/term, wether it's part of a string/value as well as a > separate/independent value/string? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b405eb5f-90e2-4e5d-9a66-13fc01427612%40googlegroups.com.
