TonyM, I agree every person should have there own tiddler and a field for each > essential relationship is important e.g. mother father but my siblings are > a relationship that should be derived not encoded, ie they share one or > more of my parents. Or cousins the children of my aunts and uncles should > be derived. I think whereever possible a relationship should be evaluated > and not encoded. >
I totally agree, but I have a problem with implementation. How do I indicate in Josiah's second term chart <https://tidbits.wiki/tw_kinship/tw_kinship.html#Notes%20for%20Bimlas> that "father" has sisters ("aunt" and "aunt")? We don't know who their parents are, so they can't come from a common ancestor. It could be solved with a randomly named ancestor, but that wouldn't be a nice solution. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/28676a82-7bf4-4552-9257-a4fa7ec8ccb2%40googlegroups.com.
