Folks, Discussion
I just want to add that when it comes to linking one tiddler to another there are automatic methods as discussed already in this thread. This should satisfy most use cases, but as you know tiddlywiki is infinitely malleable. The relationships between tiddlers need not only be automatic as in backlinks, tagging and references, but it would be quite easy to design a method to store a nominated tiddler in a current tiddler field and update a corresponding field in the other tiddler when doing so. Similarly you could maintain the relationships in a separate data tiddler or index(s) A field containing a single tiddler can be considered a one to one relationship, but a field capable of containing a list of titles could be a one to many. The fieldname pair (here to there, there to here) can define a relationship ie you can have multiple relationships for example one may be direct, the other a "dotted line" relationship. The aforementioned automatic relationships found in the info tab could be used as a source for potential "hard coded" relationships, ie it helps one explore the relationships and choose those you wish to hard code, and a seperate listing of hardcoded relationships could be displayed on the tiddlers. What are your thoughts? Regards Tony On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 12:51:45 AM UTC+11, David Gifford wrote: > > Hi guys > > Just discovered Roam (https://roamresearch.com). It's an outliner like > Dynalist and Workflowy, but has bidirectional linking. > > Any chance bidirectional linking like this could be added to TiddlyWiki? > > Here is a video > https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=25&v=v9s3pusI1JQ&feature=emb_logo > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ba57f978-e861-48db-ba27-a876078274fb%40googlegroups.com.
