People often feel that a new browser they're just trying is faster than an old one. But they rarely test it under the same conditions -- same extensions, same number of active tabs open, same amount of time with the browser opened. In particular, a browse that has just been opened will usually run faster than the same browser that's been running all day.
In the case of firefox, FF will gradually eat up almost all of the available ram, slowing the system and stalling web pages. Eventually I have to close out FF so that the system can get its RAM back. But I think Chrome/ium will do the same thing -- I just don't use Chrome that much. On Friday, July 31, 2020 at 6:03:42 AM UTC-7, si wrote: > > I recently tried out my wiki in Brave (Chromium based) rather than Firefox > and noticed that it was a little snappier. > > Saving tiddlers is measurably faster and there is a lot less lag when > using edit-text boxes (in my case the side-editor plug-in). > > *Is it generally the case that TW runs a little better in Chrome than > Firefox or is my experience just the result of the idiosyncrasies of my > particular system?* > > Note: I'm using Windows10 and Timimi to save for both browsers. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b09922b5-8509-4389-8804-543469ce8051o%40googlegroups.com.
