Eric Shulman wrote: > ... this probably shouldn't be used to publicize links to specific > TiddlyWiki implementations (such as NoteSelf, Stroll, etc.). >
Right. > Instead, it should list sites that are hosting TiddlyWiki-related > communities (i.e., "social media" sites) such as Twitter, Reddit, Discord, > etc. and possibly also "index" sites such as "TiddlyWiki Toolmap" that > provide lists of links to popular TiddlyWiki implementations. > Yes. BUT. They IMO should have achieved (a) sufficient SCALE; and (b) PROVEN LONGEVITY. TiddlyWiki Toolmap, I think, for instance, is definitely a PRIMARY candidate for inclusion now. That will help it get used more. And it will encourage users to report where it needs updating. It is the single richest *Resource Base* we have & users need know about it IMO. I am happy you administer this stuff & do what you are happy with since you do not give in to every request easily. Correct approach I think. Keeping the list as SHORT as possible is a v. good idea. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2db3d062-8685-42f3-aa48-318fccfe3624o%40googlegroups.com.
