I also want to work with indes and values. But I did not know how to do it
combining filters like you. Then i created a new filter cloning *
$:/core/modules/filters/indexes.js *and I modified it for obtain values,
the important changes are in bold.
/*\
values.js
type: application/javascript
module-type: filteroperator
Filter operator for returning the values of a data tiddler
\*/
(function(){
"use strict";
/*
Export our filter function
*/
exports.*values* = function(source,operator,options) {
var results = [];
source(function(tiddler,title) {
var data = options.wiki.getTiddlerDataCached(title);
if(data) {
$tw.utils.pushTop(results,Object.*values*(data));
}
});
return results;
};
})();
Now you can use it. [<dataTiddler>values[]] instead the *populate* macro
which is filtering the output of other filter.
El jueves, 18 de febrero de 2021 a las 20:30:23 UTC+1, Mohammad escribió:
> when using nsort on new values (e.g. value::index note :: is a character
> used to create new entries) it fails.
> One solution is as below, but for large number index - value (e.g 200 or
> more) the solution is very slow
>
> This solution contains
>
> 1. a populate macro to list all values
> 2. a wikify and list widget let sort values
> 3. a lookup macro to find index(s) for a value
>
> \define dataTiddler() myData
> \define myfilter() [<dataTiddler>indexes[]]
>
> \define populate()
> <$list filter="[subfilter<myfilter>]">
> <$text text={{{[<dataTiddler>getindex<currentTiddler>]}}}/>
> </$list>
> \end
>
> \define lookup-index(val)
> <$list filter="[subfilter<myfilter>]" variable=idx>
> <$list filter="[<dataTiddler>getindex<idx>] +[match[$val$]]">
> <tr>
> <td><$link to=<<idx>> /></td><td> $val$ </td>
> </tr>
> </$list>
> </$list>
> \end
>
>
> <table>
> <$wikify name=u text=<<populate>> >
> <$list filter="[enlist<u>nsort[]]">
> <$macrocall $name=lookup-index val=<<currentTiddler>> />
> </$list>
> </$wikify>
> </table>
>
>
> The above can be tested in https://tiddlywiki.com/ if one creates a data
> tiddler with the myData title containing the data of the previous post.
>
> Question: as stated above this solution is very slow for large numbers of
> data (index-value pairs). What alternative solution do you propose?
>
> Best wishes
> Mohammad
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:07 PM Mohammad Rahmani <mohammad...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> This is an old question and there are several solution for that, but not
>> for the case I explain here
>>
>> Assume you have a dataTiddler or JSON tiddler with data like below
>>
>> nella: -1
>> rita: 1
>> villa: 0
>> lola: -7
>> sina: 3
>> cobra: 2
>> fifa: -2
>> zila: 3
>> afra: 1
>>
>>
>> I want to list data in this dictionary table sorted by value, so I should
>> have
>>
>> lola: -7
>> fifa: -2
>> nella: -1
>> villa: 0
>> afra: 1
>> rita: 1
>> cobra: 2
>> sina: 3
>> zila: 3
>>
>> Note, there are duplicated values. The solution is that new entries
>> created from appending value to index like value::index do not work here!
>> As you need to use nsort
>>
>>
>>
>> Best wishes
>> Mohammad
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/65d562c5-88e4-49b1-aa5f-e399ca397a81n%40googlegroups.com.
