Diego,
Good idea providing "full" archive to Projectify. If packaged perhaps you
can "give" it to the author to include.
I want to do something similar with streams, but I need additional logic. I
use a naming standard for stream (tiddlers) to hide them behind system
tiddlers "$:/", however if one wants to keep them indefinitely and make
them accessible, I rename them to non system tiddlers.
Obviously If I am on a tiddler with a lot of stream notes, I may want to
archive the whole set but not remove regular tiddlers.
As mentioned by HH Mohamad's trashbin (KOOKMAs) plugin does this already,
I would like to see your solution, mohamads or the recent Basket tool
generalised to provide better tiddler to json and back handling.
Just some thoughts
Tones
On Tuesday, 4 May 2021 at 12:17:48 UTC+10 dieg...@gmail.com wrote:
> I work a lot with Nicos excellent Projectify plugin.
>
> As a result, I have a lot of ephemeral tiddlers for my to-dos that once
> done, are no longer really needed as full tiddlers. I don't need to search
> them, tag them, etc.
>
> Also, since I use node, I don't really want them cluttering the tiddlers
> folder, as I frequently go in there and do some searching outside TW.
>
> As a result, I thought about "Archiving" them, or "flattening" them, into
> a single JSON tiddler for reference.
>
> I came up with the following "Archive" button, which appends all tiddlers
> tagged with done to an Archive tiddler.
>
> Code:
> <$vars archiveTiddlerTitle="Archive"
> todoText=<<jsontiddlers "[tag[done]]" >>
> emptyJSON="[]" linebreak="
>
> ">
> <$set name="newArchiveText"
> filter="[<todoText>!match<emptyJSON>]"
> value={{{
> [title<archiveTiddlerTitle>get[text]addsuffix<linebreak>addsuffix<todoText>]
> }}}
> emptyValue={{{ [title<archiveTiddlerTitle>get[text]] }}} >
>
> <$button>
> <$action-setfield $tiddler=<<archiveTiddlerTitle>>
> $field="text"
> $value=<<newArchiveText>> />
> <$action-deletetiddler $filter="[tag[done]]" />
> Archive!
> </$button>
>
> </$set>
> </$vars>
>
>
> Some notes:
>
> - I had to solve an annoying issue with the <<jsontiddlers>> macro
> that when its empty, returns an "[]", which is actually not empty (is this
> intended?!)
> - Different archiving batches will just be appended as separate JSON
> objects, instead of merging everything back into one large JSON object.
> - There is no "unarchive" feature, and building one is probably beyond
> my abilities (thought might be a good use case for Joshua's JSON Mangler!
> if I understand it correctly!)
>
>
> This could be of use for others to "flatten" large tag structures that
> you're done with and don't need flying around as separate tiddlers.
>
> Your thoughts/suggestions/comments/etc are welcome!
>
> Diego
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d1f671bc-50f5-494f-9bae-79ea166f4a93n%40googlegroups.com.
