I meant @springer, not whoever skinner is :)

On Tuesday, 29 June 2021 at 22:29:33 UTC+1 James Anderson wrote:

> Hi Frank,
>
> I asked skinner to remove the alts, I was just playing on the same idea 
> and didn't want to flood the list of choices.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Tuesday, 29 June 2021 at 21:03:12 UTC+1 f.brunsb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> *@springer: *
>> Really cool your last picture ... and now in RGB style like the picture 
>> of James "chroma-b-alt.png"... By the way, 
>> I'm missing some pictures on tw-logo-contest.tiddlyhost.com What's going 
>> on?
>>
>> *@James.W: *Have I mentioned that I like your RGB series? I also like 
>> the spirit of "emoji-field-title.png". 
>> There might be more hints of new features swimming in the background ...
>>
>>
>> My favourites so far are (excluding my pictures) and without ranking:
>>
>>    - 3D twisted version white.png (springer)
>>    - dark-fields.png (springer)
>>    - json-file-icon-semi-alpha.png (Mohammad)
>>    - chroma-b-alt.png (James W)
>>    - emoji-field-title.png (James W)
>>
>> and even if its shine is slowly fading:
>>
>>    - iamdar-1.png (IAmDarthMole)
>>
>>
>> I agree with Jeremy, perhaps such a contest would be useful for an 
>> advertising banner. For a simple release number, the effort is great, 
>> because unfortunately it will soon be replaced again. An advertising 
>> banner, if without a number, can at least be used for longer.
>>
>> A fixed scheme (e.g. logo on the left side, release number on the right 
>> side, colours fixed in advance) and ... instead an advertising banner on 
>> "HelloThere" in the background? I would, I like that.
>>
>> Here for this competition I would have liked something like an end date, 
>> a deadline. Perhaps also a maximum number of inputs.
>> As I see it, the many beautiful pictures, only a small number of people 
>> have created. More outdoor advertising for such actions is needed. This in 
>> turn generates more "word of mouth". More people, more ideas, finished 
>> faster. 
>>
>> I will not post any new pictures now. Not that I don't enjoy it. But I 
>> don't get to do anything else.
>> However, I am happy to accept requests for changes. Also who would like 
>> to have the original files (is SVG) may contact me.
>>
>> When it comes to the vote for the best picture (if there is such a 
>> thing), I'll be there again.
>>
>> So have fun.  Frank
>>
>> springer schrieb am Dienstag, 29. Juni 2021 um 20:14:36 UTC+2:
>>
>>> With a tip of the hat to IAmDarthMole, I've been thinking for a while 
>>> that one logo-version that *deserves* to exist is a version that takes that 
>>> json mobius image posing as a zero, and makes it fit in seamlessly with the 
>>> other numbers. 
>>>
>>> I like that anyone who knows about the JSON logo will "get it" but 
>>> others will just see a 3D-typography effect, plus drag-and-drop. As a flat 
>>> png, it comes in at 19K, less than I feared for a fancy set of bezier 
>>> curves and gradients.
>>>
>>> I hope IAmDarthMole takes this as a constructive collaboration! I'm 
>>> happy to split the pile of prize money. :P
>>>
>>> -Springer
>>>
>>> [image: 3D twisted version white.png]
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 1:34:57 PM UTC-4 iamdar...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here a third attempt, *less* small things. Hopefully those that remain 
>>>> won't be *too* obscure/hard to see. I wasn't able to really think of 
>>>> any other way to show "drag and drop"
>>>>
>>>> Author: IAmDarthMole
>>>>
>>> Name: Drag n Drop JSON
>>>>
>>>> [image: Logo3.png]
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 1:11:31 PM UTC-4 TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  jeremy...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ... I think there is too much textual content in many of the entries. 
>>>>>> Creating new slogans/taglines for TiddlyWiki is not part of the brief, 
>>>>>> and 
>>>>>> just takes up a lot of space. The artwork is designed to break the flow 
>>>>>> of 
>>>>>> a generally text-heavy site; packing more text into images makes things 
>>>>>> worse. The text that needs to be there is "v5.2.0". 
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Totally agree. BUT, also 'v5.2.0'  is a kind of "jump" isn't it? What 
>>>>> is I mean is, its slightly potentially more newish, hence the number?
>>>>> A word slogan/flag pointing to that might not be so bad?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just thoughts
>>>>> TT
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/bac4e5fe-aee8-400f-a374-3e9ec7a5a828n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to