reinhard...@gmail.com wrote: > ... may I suggest the two terms > > *Transcluder* (the tiddler that's doing the transclusion) > *Transcludee* (the tiddler that's being transcluded) >
I think that is a neat observation! The "linguistics" of terms in computing generally often lacks the precision to know what is the "subject" and what is the "object". They blurr. In the specific case: you are pointing to a language issue that actually could be very relevant to beginners to understand what is what in real usage. Part of the issue* though* is that in TW "transclusion" is potentially *radical*. Transclusions can be nested infinitely. So, in that context, the terms "Transcluder" / "Transcludee" would not be so transparent in actual use. Just a comment TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d3620a7e-0348-4f8f-ae34-e0608a94634dn%40googlegroups.com.
