I'm not 100% sure yet, but there seems to be a bug. I'll have a closer
look.
A fast look to the code suggests, that the documentation is right.
But I can confirm, that *it does not work* as intended with my test
tiddlers.
-m
On Wednesday, April 17, 2024 at 1:39:12 AM UTC+2 springer wrote:
> Interesting! The documentation DOES imply that you can tuck :reverse into
> the very place where you had it!
>
> Perhaps this is just an error in documentation? In fact it works fine if
> it comes *before* the sort-type parameter:
>
> `{{{ [has[version]] :sort:reverse:version[get[version]] }}}`
>
> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7:31:00 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:
>
>> I see, I can use that separate reverse operator instead of doing it in
>> the initial sort.
>>
>> I'm still not sure how to use the reverse documented here in the flaglist
>> in the :sort filter run prefix:
>>
>> https://tiddlywiki.com/#Sort%20Filter%20Run%20Prefix
>>
>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 182937.png]
>>
>> I'll post any future questions in the other forums.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Cade
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:01:18 PM UTC-5 springer wrote:
>>
>>> Of course, I meant "come on over *from* google groups, and join us at
>>> talk.tiddlywiki.org"
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:59:58 PM UTC-4 springer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Cade! As you might note with other posts at google groups, the
>>>> community for this discussion has migrated to talk.tiddlywiki.org.
>>>>
>>>> Although we (at that forum) can still *see* posts from the google
>>>> group, we can't reply easily to them.
>>>>
>>>> So please come on over to google groups.
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, I can suggest that the documentation on the reverse Operator
>>>> <https://tiddlywiki.com/#reverse%20Operator%20(Examples)> shows that
>>>> it doesn't take a parameter, nor does it work as a parameter within the
>>>> sort filter run prefix; instead it works at the "caboose" end of any
>>>> filter
>>>> to flip the list order. Something like this works at Tiddlywiki.com:
>>>>
>>>> `{{{ [has[version]] :sort:version[get[version]] +[reverse[]] }}}`
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 12:29:33 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have change logs with a field for version information, and I am
>>>>> trying to sort them in reverse order and it doesn't appear to be working.
>>>>>
>>>>> The change log tiddlers themselves are also lists, but I cleared all that
>>>>> out and loaded these into the latest TW version to make a minimal
>>>>> reproducible case. If I take out the sort entirely, the 10.0 comes to
>>>>> the
>>>>> top as you would expect for them to be sorted by title. But the sort
>>>>> either with or without :reverse is the same.
>>>>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112417.png]
>>>>> <ul><$list filter="[ascend.change[index]]
>>>>> :sort:version:reverse[get[ascend.version]]"><li><$link to={{!!title}}
>>>>> /><br/><$transclude/></li></$list></ul>
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112528.png]
>>>>> What am I doing wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/94c1b8d1-b624-4e79-8801-d9d37a65862an%40googlegroups.com.
