Ok, at least I can see your point. If we establish a forum as a google.group's successor, it should be better than it is (although, this seems true only if there will be a "linear" representation of threads still available -- to read the upcoming threads just for answering/exploring new things -- and also there should be possibilities to track comments on a specific thread). This is to be considered as a good step without regard to the documentation establishing.
> to moderate and shift threads I found easier than adjusting > TWs. It usually just works out of the box :-) (it's really that easy > as marking the thread with a checkbox and selecting the forum where to > move) Not exactly. If we understand that a part of a forum should be splitted (say, first we have a "plugins" subforum and then we understand that it should be splitted into repositories' section, discussions of specific plugins, desire box etc), it is quite effortful to proceed the split as we have all the old threads not sorted and some of them even wouldn't be sortable as they correspond to two or more subforums simultaneously (this is what I really don't like about forums and like about TW -- you don't have to follow the tree structure). But once again, it seems that there is some point in replacing the group with a forum (easier way to search old threads). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
