> I'm not sure it's relevant, but there's now a few SSJS engines > knocking around (e.g. SilkJS http://silkjs.org/)
Interesting. My first reaction is not to like the JST file idea, but I'll dig around a bit. >> Yup, I'm finding that lots of modules that I'm interested in are >> already built and tested both for node and the browser (for example, >> peg.js, which I'm planning to use for parsing CSS and so on). > > Have you seen language.js as well > (https://github.com/tolmasky/language)? It has similar syntax to > peg.js, but seems somewhat better at error handling. Brilliant, I hadn't seen that, very interesting, thanks. Best wishes Jeremy > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.