On Tuesday, February 7, 2012 3:42:51 AM UTC+7, perlguy wrote: > > > Agreed... my initial excitement over seeing the words "chromeless web > browser" were dashed when I got to the part where they say it's not > been open sourced yet... and on further reflection, it probably > wouldn't work as replacement for prism/webrunner anyway, being tied to > YUI, etc. >
My ultimate hope would be that TiddlyWiki itself could be implemented in such a way as to not require *any* browser, be freed of that dependence. Ideally being able to choose to run within a given browser as well, just not requiring it. Does anyone know of a tiddlywiki friendly replacement for prism by > chance? One that stays current with the underlying rendering and > javascript engines? (I still use standalone prism for my TWs on XP... > Inherent contradiction there. TW's current (soon to be called "legacy" I guess) implementation's storage model doesn't fit with modern browsers' tighter security. The FOSS project upstream of Chrome has a Prism analog in the works, but I imagine it will only work well with the future TW "NG". sadly, it no longer works under linux - some library dependency broke in > F15 or F16 > I have some legacy apps with very important data I haven't got around to converting that I run in a VM when needed - a pain to get set up, but now it's just like launching "just another app" - not much bigger or slower than launching something like Photoshop (or a fully loaded FF 8-) either. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/nhQc5L42j6IJ. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
