This thread is based upon this discussion: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/tiddlywikidev/zNxAhIuMUns/tEfEn5IO67sJ
Am Sonntag, 27. Oktober 2013 18:54:34 UTC+1 schrieb Jeremy Ruston: > > Hi Stephen > > I like the double back tick idea. > > I implemented it. ` and `` both are now a possible way of quoting code runs. While I've been on that, I realised that there might be problems when the last character of such a code run is a backtick. For example, this won't work: set a variable like this: ``dir=`ls -al``` The last backtick of the 3-backtick sequence won't be part of the inline run. While thinking about that, I also realized that other formatting stuff will also fail in similar situations like: //italic/// ''bold''' So what to do? Maybe, I thought, adding an additional space character would be sufficient: set a variable like this: ``dir=`ls -al` `` //italic/ // ''bold' '' But then we have a space more than we wanted and in case of code runs it will be obvious and maybe fatal. So the next idea was to define that one space in front of the ending sequence should always be optional and silently be "eaten" by the parser. So the above code examples would be rendered without the one single character in front of the ``, // or ''. The required code change in TW5 is minimal. Usually it's just that " ?" has to be added to the regular expression for the end sequence. What do you think about this proposal? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
