Hi Andrew

If you want to be able to type a literal linebreak then I'd recommend using
<br>; there's no performance difference with including the slash. Both
forms will always be supported in TW5 because they are part of the basic
HTML tags in wikitext feature.

Best wishes

Jeremy



On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:18 PM, andrew.j.harrison84 <
andrew.j.harriso...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Just when you thought this thread was done. Please forgive me if this was
> previously answered but which functions best with TW5 going forward for
> line-breaks? <br> or <br/> or something else? I'm wondering if there is any
> performance differences for each or if anyone knows best practice or what
> will be the standard?
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Epic™ 4G Touch
>
> Jeremy Ruston <jeremy.rus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I meant to add one key difference between MarkDown and TW5 WikiText; in
> MarkDown:
>
> > Note that Markdown formatting syntax is not processed within block-level
> HTML tags. E.g., you can’t use Markdown-style *emphasis* inside an HTML
> block.
>
> Meanwhile TW5 *does* process wikitext within block-level HTML tags, which
> I think makes the HTML tag handling much more useful.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Jeremy Ruston <jeremy.rus...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex
>>
>> > I am in favor of implemented the GFM features, but implementing single
>> line breaks would make it a pain to write HTML in tiddlers. Github does not
>> have this problem since you're not supposed to put HTML in Markdown.
>>
>> Thanks Alex, I did not know that the line break handling isn't part of
>> GFM.
>>
>> HTML has always been part of MarkDown:
>>
>> http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#html
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Jeremy.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Alex V <alexverm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Single line breaks is not part of GFM
>>> <https://help.github.com/articles/github-flavored-markdown>, it is part
>>> of the additional features of writing on Github
>>> <https://help.github.com/articles/writing-on-github>.
>>>
>>> I am in favor of implemented the GFM features, but implementing single
>>> line breaks would make it a pain to write HTML in tiddlers. Github does not
>>> have this problem since you're not supposed to put HTML in Markdown.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 12:27:51 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>>
>>>>  TiddlyWiki's paragraph handling is copied from MarkDown, which is
>>>> becoming a very popular format for online writing. Classic MarkDown treats
>>>> single line breaks as white space, just like HTML.
>>>>
>>>> http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
>>>>
>>>> More recently, GitHub Flavoured MarkDown has gained popularity, which
>>>> adds (amongst other things) the convention that a single line break
>>>> produces an HTML <br> tag:
>>>>
>>>> https://help.github.com/articles/github-flavored-markdown
>>>>
>>>> The plan is to bring GFM-style linebreak handling to TW5.
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes
>>>>
>>>> Jeremy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Kolya <kol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's a factual standard established by how the majority of online
>>>>> editors work.
>>>>> Another standard is that some people will rather play dumb instead of
>>>>> openly disagreeing.
>>>>> That should sound familiar to you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 00:56:28 UTC+2, Stephan Hradek wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am Montag, 26. Mai 2014 16:10:56 UTC+2 schrieb Kolya:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There's a standard how webeditors handle linebreaks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there? Can you tell me where? I'm really interested.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>
>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jeremy Ruston
>>>> mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy Ruston
>> mailto:jeremy.rus...@gmail.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jeremy Ruston
> mailto:jeremy.rus...@gmail.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
>
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
>
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Jeremy Ruston
mailto:jeremy.rus...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to