Hey, thanks for all the responses.
Yes, <tt> is deprecated. The other, more semantically correct examples
Daniel mentioned would have been a better example. <kbd> is probably the
closest to what I was looking for.
Tom's solution or something like it involving a macro that wraps the text
with <kbd> tags will probably fit the bill.
- A
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 8:57:40 AM UTC-4, Ton Gerner wrote:
>
> Hi Alnilam,
>
> You can create a monospace style:
>
> /* MONOSPACED TEXT */
> .monospace {
> font-family: Inconsolata, Consolas, monospace, serif;
> }
>
> and a macro:
>
> \define mono(text)
> @@.monospace $text$@@
> \end
>
> Then you can create monospaced text by:
>
> <<mono "Text to convert to monospace">>
>
> If you make a bookmarklet for it, it will be easy to get monospace text.
>
> For making bookmarklets the easy way (for non-programmers), see [1] (I
> made a 'monospace' bookmarklet as well).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ton
>
> [1] http://tw5bookmarklets.tiddlyspot.com/
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 1:16:41 AM UTC+2, Daniel Baird wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's not a solution to your problem, but I'm interested to know what you
>> using mono to represent, semantically? Not source code, obviously. I'm
>> wondering if it is covered by a html semantic element at all (like var,
>> kbd, samp, code, etc).
>>
>> Cheers
>> ;Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 10 August 2014 12:21, <aln...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The monospacing difference is the one I'm struggling with. I like the
>>> transition to the more MarkDown-like ``` for code-blocks, but the problem
>>> is there does not appear to be any documented replacement for _inline_
>>> monospacing in TW5. There are inline code-blocks, but what about just
>>> inline monospace without the background formatting of the code-block
>>> syntax? <tt> seems to work, but would it be worth having {{ }} for
>>> that like some other wikitext <https://help.wikispaces.com/Wikitext>
>>> variants?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 5:31:10 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jack
>>>>
>>>> > an example would be monospacing text, which seems to work
>>>> differently in TW5
>>>>
>>>> The new syntax is described here:
>>>>
>>>> http://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText:%
>>>> 5B%5BFormatting%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D%20%5B%5BCode%
>>>> 20Blocks%20in%20WikiText%5D%5D
>>>>
>>>> > Is there a way of knowing where the differences between "Classic" and
>>>> TW5 are?
>>>>
>>>> Quite a while ago pmario put together this comparison:
>>>>
>>>> http://compare-tw2-tw5.tiddlyspace.com
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to have a summary tiddler on tiddlywiki.com of the syntax
>>>> differences - contributions welcome :)
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes
>>>>
>>>> Jeremy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:25 PM, <jack....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm using TiddlyWiki 5.0.12, so version 5 - I had guessed that was
>>>>> the difference between the two sets of documentation. There are some
>>>>> topics
>>>>> covered on tiddlywiki.org that do not seem to have a corresponding
>>>>> topic on tiddlywiki.com <http://tiddlywiki.com>- an example would be
>>>>> monospacing text, which seems to work differently in TW5, but I'm not
>>>>> quite
>>>>> sure how. Is there a way of knowing where the differences between
>>>>> "Classic"
>>>>> and TW5 are? Thanks for the help.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jack
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:55:30 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jack
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which version of TiddlyWiki are you using? The documentation at
>>>>>> http://tiddlywiki.org/ covers the older "Classic" versions of
>>>>>> TiddlyWiki. The new version 5 at tiddlywiki.com is not fully
>>>>>> backwards compatible, and has significant differences in the wikitext
>>>>>> syntax. The documentation at tiddlywiki.com only covers the new
>>>>>> version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best wishes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeremy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:29 PM, <jack....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm new to TiddlyWiki, and looking for a guide to WikiText - the one
>>>>>>> found at http://tiddlywiki.org/ seems out of date on some points,
>>>>>>> and the one at http://tiddlywiki.com/ doesn't seem complete yet.
>>>>>>> Is there a more comprehensive guide anywhere?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Jack
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jeremy Ruston
>>>>>> mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jeremy Ruston
>>>> mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Baird
>> objoke: I had a problem and decided to solve it with threading. Now,
>> have problems. two I
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
