Dear Mr Packers, I do a bit of both...
But recently I have a huge mess of a TiddlyWiki: i like it like that. The new feature where you can drag tiddlers from the menu of one TW and import them into another makes it less important to organised -- my hypothesis. best wishes Alex On 24 October 2014 15:26, Captain Packers <drdl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm just wondering what MO people have adopted as "best practice" and why. > Do you use a single TiddlyWiki for everything, or do you have a virtual > "web" of multiple TiddlyWikis that you jump around in. > > I see the benefit of a single TiddlyWiki as being the search ability and > non-linear convenience and approach around which TiddlyWiki was built. My > concern about a single TiddlyWiki is the eventual size that it might attain > and related performance issues, especially if you start embedding and > attaching files internally (TW5). > > With a web of TiddlyWikis, they could be kept small, but you might > sacrifice some of the search ability of TiddlyWiki. > > I'm using TiddlyWiki mostly for journaling my workflow. > > I would like to know how others are doing this. > > Thanks in advance. > > Captain Packers > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
