On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 12:51:23 PM UTC+1, Tobias Beer wrote: > > As for size, this is what the absolutes say: > > *65k => 44 core images* > *118k => 519 awesome font icons* >
IMO that's not important at all. Users tend to include full size images into TW. So one eg: 1MByte image will blow optimizations here away. On the other hand the TW core svgs are not optimized at all. SVG icons will have a lager footprint as an icon font, but I'm sure it won't be too much. > > Try to create a 2 color icon with a font. > > > I hope to never see a core icon library > with in-themselves multi-color icons. > Also, being able to do that in theory doesn't mean that > the core icons practically allow for it... > most of which are optimized not to. > Why not, you use them on your tb5 wiki as well. So imo it's a pretty common desire. > Certainly, not all grass is green in icon-font-land, however... > > http://css-tricks.com/icon-fonts-vs-svg > > ...is a bit too biased to my taste. > May be. Some more ;) http://maddesigns.de/svg-sprites-icon-fonts-2309.html http://ianfeather.co.uk/ten-reasons-we-switched-from-an-icon-font-to-svg/ For me SVG is much more flexible and we can establish our own icon style. Icons are part of the identity of a project and it is one way to be different. Even for this single reason it's worth to have our own icons. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
